Did ISRO’s Chandrayaan-3 find proof of 700 aliens (Cyanobacteria, Saccharomycetales , Acidophilus, Pyrodictium, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacteria, Melanopyrus, Euglenozoa, Amoebozoa, Loukozoa, Percolozoa, Microsporidia and Sulcozoa et cetera) on Moon?

This claim is completely false as the social media handles and official website of ISRO have made no such statements yet.

July 20, 1969 was — in mankind’s best guess — the first time a living being prepared to land on a celestial body and observed the luminous blue planet shrouded in the seemingly infinite darkness of space.

But before that moment, the crew of Apollo 11, hurtling toward the moon, radioed the mission command in Houston to ask about a curious object they saw on their third day in space.

“Do you have any idea where the S-IVB is with respect to us?” Commander Neil Armstrong asked, referring to the third stage of the Saturn V rocket that was jettisoned earlier in the flight.

Mission control had an answer about three minutes later, according to a NASA radio transcript of the mission.

“Apollo 11, Houston,” the command replied. “The S-IVB is about 6,000 nautical miles from you now. Over.” That satisfied Armstrong, who said 12 seconds later: “Okay. Thank you.”

Earth viewed from the lunar orbit before landing. (NASA)

The seemingly innocuous exchange has become a touchstone for UFO-sighting enthusiasts and alien truthers, and now, seemingly fake news.

Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, 88, the second astronaut to set foot on the moon, believed that the crew saw an extraterrestrial spacecraft at this moment, and a “lie detector” test proves it, at least according to the British tabloid The Daily Star.

That’s not quite right.

“He has never said he saw a UFO. This story has been a fabrication for the sake of headlines and is not true as far as Buzz Aldrin is concerned,” his spokeswoman, Christina Korp, told The Washington Post in a statement Tuesday. That echoes Aldrin’s 2015 comment on Reddit that the object “was not an alien.” The Daily Star did not return a request for comment.

The truth is out there if only the Daily Star looked more closely.

The tabloid’s story focuses on a vocal analysis conducted by the Ohio-based Institute of BioAcoustic Biology and Sound Health, a nonprofit institution that founder Sharry Edwards has said developed a program that can evaluate how truthful or confident someone feels about a subject they are talking about.

Pence vows America will return to the moon. The history of such promises suggests otherwise.

Edwards told The Post she used Aldrin’s interview from the 2006 Discovery Science made-for-TV documentary “Apollo 11: The Untold Story” to analyze Aldrin’s remarks.

“There was something out there that was close enough to be observed, and what could it be?” Aldrin recounted about the incident, adding that crew member Michael Collins saw ellipses on the L-shaped object when viewed through a telescope. “That didn’t tell us very much,” he said.

The moment called for restraint from theorizing what the object might be during one of the most scrutinized missions in human history, Aldrin said.

Buzz Aldrin during the Apollo 11 mission. (NASA)

“Who knows what somebody would have demanded that we turn back because of aliens or whatever the reason is,” he said on the program. The crew decided to move on and mention it later in the mission debrief, Aldrin added.

In an analysis, Edwards says Aldrin “has a firm belief in what he saw but logical awareness that he cannot explain what he saw; therefore he thinks he should be doubted.”

She said that the conclusion was published years ago but that she does not know how it became suddenly relevant.

Aldrin has already clarified his position on the incident.

In a response on the NASA website after the documentary was released, Aldrin said he believed he saw one of four panels separated from the S-IVB heading on the same trajectory toward the moon but on a slightly different course. That discussion was edited out, and the rest was “taken out of context,” NASA said.

In the 2015 Reddit thread, he said the sun must have glinted off one of the panels.

The recurring UFO story is the result in part of the public distorting the scientific term UFO to mean a craft with “little green men,” NASA chief historian Bill Barry told The Post.

Yet the Apollo 11 mission was already a significant moment in human history without the intrigue of alien spacecraft.

The median age of Americans is about 38, or 11 years younger than the mission itself. Most people alive today were not around to hear President John F. Kennedy say in 1961 that the United States would send a man to the moon and return him safely to Earth.

The Soviet Union had already been the first to send a man into Earth’s orbit, frustrating NASA and creating a belief that the Russians might have an edge. The stakes were high. “They were basically on a war footing,” Barry said of NASA leadership.

NASA’s lessons from the mission were extensive. For instance, leaders honed the organization for large scientific projects, which later helped develop the International Space Station, Barry said. And investment in science paved the way for the Internet, cellphones and much more.

‘We shall return’: Eugene Cernan was the last man to walk on the moon. There was no return.

Discoveries also offered more hints about the origin of life on Earth and the history of the universe. Evaluating the rock samples from the moon helped confirm theories that the body is the result of an object that smashed into Earth and later coalesced to form our satellite, Barry said.

That lesson amounted to a common refrain among astronauts, he added: “We left the Earth, and what we discovered was ourselves.”

In the next five centuries, humanity will remember the 20th century for three things, Barry said: two world wars and the United States landing on the moon.

Aldrin has been known to defend that history, now and in the past.

In 2002, filmmaker Bart Sibrel confronted Aldrin, demanding that he swear on a Bible that the landing was authentic. Sibrel called him a “coward and a liar.”

Sibrel was adding “thief” when Aldrin struck him in the face. No charges were filed.

The moment was captured on video. There were no camera tricks. The punch was real.

Continue reading “Did ISRO’s Chandrayaan-3 find proof of 700 aliens (Cyanobacteria, Saccharomycetales , Acidophilus, Pyrodictium, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacteria, Melanopyrus, Euglenozoa, Amoebozoa, Loukozoa, Percolozoa, Microsporidia and Sulcozoa et cetera) on Moon?”

How are Rolex Watches Made?

Rolex is one of the world’s best-known watch brands and is easily seen as one of the higher luxury timepieces. Everyone knows the brand name and the iconic watches, but because Rolex is so notoriously famous for being secretive about their models and operations not many people know how they make their watches.

Knowing about the brand and how Rolex makes watches is important to know how and why these timepieces are so luxurious. So, we’ve put together this guide to show exactly what process Rolex takes to manufacture their watches, what materials they use and more.

 

 

A Brief History Of Rolex
Rolex is an extremely recognisable luxury watch brand and the high quality of their prod-ucts is why they are so renowned. Founded in 1905 as Wilsdorf and Davis by Hans Wilsdorf and Alfred Davies in London, the company registered Rolex as the brand name of its watches in 1908 and became Rolex Watch Co. LTD in 1915.

Continue reading “How are Rolex Watches Made?”

Uranium Spot Price Jan Update 2022 : E.V. Blind-spots how to make electricity 101

Electric-powered vehicles or devices are like derivates market. The underlying stock is electricity in various forms of production and for not-so-first-world countries, the best cheap, and easy way is to produce using nuclear power at least giving them without a single day of the blackout.

In order to actually be able to use electric power, we need to have electricity in the order of 234,000 terawatt-hours. For normal usage but now with all this hype about Electric vehicles where are the sources to produce these orders of energy on top of the normal usage?

Statistic: Net electricity consumption worldwide in select years from 1980 to 2019 (in terawatt-hours) | Statista

Nuclear power rebounds and increases 2% in 2021, reversing only half of the decline in output that took place in 2020. Seven new reactors came online in the second half of 2020 and Q1 2021, more than offsetting the three reactors retired over the same period. Up to ten more new reactors could be connected to the grid worldwide by the end of 2021, including four in China. Despite the increase in operational capacity over the course of the year, global nuclear power in 2021 remains slightly below the 2019 level.

Across advanced economies, nuclear power increases slightly in 2021, with output remaining 6% below 2019 levels. Nonetheless, nuclear remains the largest single source of low-carbon generation in these economies.

 

Nuclear power in the United States is expected to decline further in 2021, with five reactors scheduled to be retired during the year, leaving output more than 4% below 2019 levels. The anticipated declines in the United States in 2021 offset increases in other advanced economies. In Japan, the progressive restart of reactors is likely to increase nuclear output by 6% in 2021, reversing only a small fraction of the 30 TWh decline in output in 2020. Across the European Union, the output is set to increase by more than 2% in 2021, due primarily to higher electricity demand in France and a new reactor in Slovakia, but this increase is insufficient to make up for the drop in 2020. In emerging markets and developing economies, nuclear power is set to increase by over 5% in 2021, with new reactors coming online in several countries, led by China and complemented by new reactors in India, United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, and Russia. The growth in 2021 pushes output from nuclear to 8% above 2019 levels, with emerging market and developing economies increasing their share of global nuclear output to almost one-third, up from 29% in 2019.

The Complete Ferengi Rules Of Acquisition

1.  Once you have their money, never give it back

2.  You can’t cheat an honest customer, but it never hurts to try

3.  Never spend more for an acquisition than you have to

4.  Sex and profit are the two things that never last long enough

5.  If you can’t break a contract, bend it

6.  Never let family stand in the way of opportunity

7.  Always keep you ears open

8.  Keep count of your change

9.  Instinct plus opportunity equals profit

10.  A dead customer can’t buy as much as a live one

11.  Latinum isn’t the only thing that shines

Continue reading “The Complete Ferengi Rules Of Acquisition”

Marijuana Smoke vs. Tobacco: Which is More Dangerous? Math behind Legalizing the illegal [whatever…]

It’s widely assumed that smoking is smoking and that the risks of marijuana will therefore be equal to the risks of smoking tobacco, but this doesn’t appear to be the case. Additionally, cannabis vaporizers could reduce the risk of marijuana consumption even further.

Economics of making agriculture profitable but not LED, VERTICAL, INDOOR ELECTRICAL CURRENT FARMING

 

Smoking tobacco is widely recognized as the leading preventable cause of death in the world. Smokers die an average of 10 years younger than non-smokers, and conditions such as lung cancer, coronary heart disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are caused by smoking tobacco. Marijuana is also (usually) smoked, and so it seems natural to assume that the risks of smoking it would be equal to the risks of smoking tobacco. The marijuana smoke vs. tobacco smoke issue seems irrelevant because smoking in any form is bad. However, research appears to show that while marijuana smoking is still dangerous, it is less so than smoking tobacco. The biggest advantage marijuana has over tobacco, though, is that people who use it medicinally or recreationally (where allowed by law) don’t have to smoke it.

Continue reading “Marijuana Smoke vs. Tobacco: Which is More Dangerous? Math behind Legalizing the illegal [whatever…]”