Indian freedom struggle was a huge mathematical equation that had multiple factors/actors that contributed to the success of the freedom of India on 15 August 1947. We started living in a globalized economy even before the initial struggle towards independence.
The European market aka the Tulip mania was an era of agricultural businesses and the inventions of the first stocks started with the advent of European colonies in order to avoid risk but not completely rather distribute the risks equally among their shareholders. Before the invention stocks tulips and similar agro-based commodities were sold based on bonds and a guarantee that they were being given at a price that was predetermined which held value to the European markets. These were the initial roots of the division of power from the colonial power. Many agribased products were forced to be harvested without change in the crop seasons and farmers of the colonies had bad times and were hugely taxed to meet the European market demands. As time passed there have been many revolutions against the colonial authority and many have tried and failed.
Why did we get independence only in the 1940s’s why was the First World War not part of the equation why only the Second World War? Why?
Because It was a multiplayer iterative game.
During the 1940’s Germany restarted its campaign to claim its status as a superpower or a powerhouse of immense technology and intellectual advancement and to reclaim its dignity as a European superpower.
It wasn’t new as Germany had tried to overpower its European clans during World War 1 why didn’t the Freedom struggle succeed during the first time around?
Well here is the actual reason.
India has played an iterative game with multiple payoffs that precisely culminated during the Second World war.
Many people have an allergy to cow milk but can consume goat milk products. This is usually not a lactose intolerance, but a difference in some of the other components.
Worldwide more people consume goat milk and goat milk products than cow milk and cow milk products. While both milk products have significant benefits, there are situations in which people prefer or choose goat milk. Goats are smaller and consume significantly less feed than cows, making them much easier to keep in developing countries. Milk is considered an important source of calories and nutrition in many developing countries. In many countries other than the United States, goat milk flavor is preferred over cow milk.
Additionally, many people who have an allergy to cow milk can consume goat milk products without experiencing an allergic reaction. This is usually not a lactose intolerance, but a difference in some of the other components like less lactose and different forms of proteins.Michigan State University Extensionrecommends individuals with dairy intolerance be tested to see if goat milk is right for them if they react to cow milk.
This claim is completely false as the social media handles and official website of ISRO have made no such statements yet.
July 20, 1969 was — in mankind’s best guess — the first time a living being prepared to land on a celestial body and observed the luminous blue planet shrouded in the seemingly infinite darkness of space.
But before that moment, the crew of Apollo 11, hurtling toward the moon, radioed the mission command in Houston to ask about a curious object they saw on their third day in space.
“Do you have any idea where the S-IVB is with respect to us?” Commander Neil Armstrong asked, referring to the third stage of the Saturn V rocket that was jettisoned earlier in the flight.
Mission control had an answer about three minutes later, according to a NASA radio transcript of the mission.
“Apollo 11, Houston,” the command replied. “The S-IVB is about 6,000 nautical miles from you now. Over.” That satisfied Armstrong, who said 12 seconds later: “Okay. Thank you.”
Earth viewed from the lunar orbit before landing. (NASA)
The seemingly innocuous exchange has become a touchstone for UFO-sighting enthusiasts and alien truthers, and now, seemingly fake news.
Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, 88, the second astronaut to set foot on the moon, believed that the crew saw an extraterrestrial spacecraft at this moment, and a “lie detector” test proves it, at least according to the British tabloid The Daily Star.
That’s not quite right.
“He has never said he saw a UFO. This story has been a fabrication for the sake of headlines and is not true as far as Buzz Aldrin is concerned,” his spokeswoman, Christina Korp, told The Washington Post in a statement Tuesday. That echoes Aldrin’s 2015 comment on Reddit that the object “was not an alien.” The Daily Star did not return a request for comment.
The truth is out there if only the Daily Star looked more closely.
The tabloid’s story focuses on a vocal analysis conducted by the Ohio-based Institute of BioAcoustic Biology and Sound Health, a nonprofit institution that founder Sharry Edwards has said developed a program that can evaluate how truthful or confident someone feels about a subject they are talking about.
Pence vows America will return to the moon. The history of such promises suggests otherwise.
Edwards told The Post she used Aldrin’s interview from the 2006 Discovery Science made-for-TV documentary “Apollo 11: The Untold Story” to analyze Aldrin’s remarks.
“There was something out there that was close enough to be observed, and what could it be?” Aldrin recounted about the incident, adding that crew member Michael Collins saw ellipses on the L-shaped object when viewed through a telescope. “That didn’t tell us very much,” he said.
The moment called for restraint from theorizing what the object might be during one of the most scrutinized missions in human history, Aldrin said.
Buzz Aldrin during the Apollo 11 mission. (NASA)
“Who knows what somebody would have demanded that we turn back because of aliens or whatever the reason is,” he said on the program. The crew decided to move on and mention it later in the mission debrief, Aldrin added.
In an analysis, Edwards says Aldrin “has a firm belief in what he saw but logical awareness that he cannot explain what he saw; therefore he thinks he should be doubted.”
She said that the conclusion was published years ago but that she does not know how it became suddenly relevant.
Aldrin has already clarified his position on the incident.
In a response on the NASA website after the documentary was released, Aldrin said he believed he saw one of four panels separated from the S-IVB heading on the same trajectory toward the moon but on a slightly different course. That discussion was edited out, and the rest was “taken out of context,” NASA said.
In the 2015 Reddit thread, he said the sun must have glinted off one of the panels.
The recurring UFO story is the result in part of the public distorting the scientific term UFO to mean a craft with “little green men,” NASA chief historian Bill Barry told The Post.
Yet the Apollo 11 mission was already a significant moment in human history without the intrigue of alien spacecraft.
The median age of Americans is about 38, or 11 years younger than the mission itself. Most people alive today were not around to hear President John F. Kennedy say in 1961 that the United States would send a man to the moon and return him safely to Earth.
The Soviet Union had already been the first to send a man into Earth’s orbit, frustrating NASA and creating a belief that the Russians might have an edge. The stakes were high. “They were basically on a war footing,” Barry said of NASA leadership.
NASA’s lessons from the mission were extensive. For instance, leaders honed the organization for large scientific projects, which later helped develop the International Space Station, Barry said. And investment in science paved the way for the Internet, cellphones and much more.
Discoveries also offered more hints about the origin of life on Earth and the history of the universe. Evaluating the rock samples from the moon helped confirm theories that the body is the result of an object that smashed into Earth and later coalesced to form our satellite, Barry said.
That lesson amounted to a common refrain among astronauts, he added: “We left the Earth, and what we discovered was ourselves.”
In the next five centuries, humanity will remember the 20th century for three things, Barry said: two world wars and the United States landing on the moon.
Aldrin has been known to defend that history, now and in the past.
In 2002, filmmaker Bart Sibrel confronted Aldrin, demanding that he swear on a Bible that the landing was authentic. Sibrel called him a “coward and a liar.”
Sibrel was adding “thief” when Aldrin struck him in the face. No charges were filed.
The moment was captured on video. There were no camera tricks. The punch was real.
The flag hoisting will take place at the Gaj Dwar, one of the three ceremonial entrances of the new building on September 17. The day coincides with the Vishwakarma Puja and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s birthday.
New Delhi: A day ahead of the special session of Parliament, a ceremonial flag hoisting will take place at the new building on September 17. The day coincides with the Vishwakarma Puja and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s birthday.
According to sources, the upcoming special session, slated to take place from September 18 to 22, will commence in the old building before relocating to the recently inaugurated New Parliament building. This will be the first session to be held within the premises of the New Parliament, which was officially unveiled by the Prime Minister on May 28.
The flag hoisting will take place at the Gaj Dwar, one of the three ceremonial entrances of the new building.
According to a report by the Indian Express, on Tuesday, the Central Public Works Department, responsible for the construction of the new building, initiated arrangements for a ‘national flag-raising event’. They initiated this process by issuing a tender for the procurement of a public address system.
The flag hoisting will done by Rajya Sabha chairman and Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is also expected to be present during the function.
As the session approaches, senior officials from both the Union Housing and Urban Affairs Ministry and the CPWD visited the new building on Tuesday. During these visits, they conducted final inspections to ensure optimal audio levels in the Rajya Sabha and tested the multimedia systems used by Members of Parliament, as reported by an official.
It’s difficult to associate religion with finance. After all, religions are supposed to be all about faith and spirituality. However, religion is much like any other organization. Religion has leadership. It has income and expenses.
Therefore, you can think of organized religion much like a business. In fact, there’s a lot of money that goes through religious hands, and it’s a good thing that most of that money is used for charity—at least we all would hope that’s the case. In any rate, there are many religions out there that are actually rich organizations, and here’s a list the world’s top ten.
